---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260730-bae094
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024TJ0433_INF
url_hash: bae094d177602d2cee4c09dea110778f23a83e2fb95dcba4a0a94fb46d16efeb
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024TJ0433_INF
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-30T17:03:08Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-30T21:01:02.194129Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-30T21:04:12Z'
status: published
content_hash: e29e1238925090fb3eb19fd52e8d8fa2e14f39b3e7aef98c6453885b259e3d0b
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024TJ0433_INF),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: 一般裁判第一院2026年2月25日判決：Batchelorは規制文書の閲覧権を求めるが、理由を明示せず、審理の保護や調査目的の例外により公共利益に反する。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: 一般裁判第一院2026年2月25日判決：Batchelorは規制文書の閲覧権を求めるが、理由を明示せず、審理の保護や調査目的の例外により公共利益に反する。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024TJ0433_INF
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: THE ANSWER
  type: organization
- name: general_news
  type: concept
- name: immigration courts
  type: location
- name: First Secretary
  type: person
- name: Chamber of Deputies
  type: UNKNOWN
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: BBC
  type: organization
  weight: 2.0
- name: trump
  type: person
  weight: 2.0
- name: Heat
  type: UNKNOWN
  weight: 1.0
- name: Parental_Guidance
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Accessibility_Help
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William
  Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001
  – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper
  – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection
  of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections,
  investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case
  T-433/24.
---

# Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24.

## TL;DR
一般裁判第一院2026年2月25日判決：Batchelorは規制文書の閲覧権を求めるが、理由を明示せず、審理の保護や調査目的の例外により公共利益に反する。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024TJ0433_INF) — published 2026-07-30T17:03:08Z