---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260730-7ab9d9
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TJ0350_INF
url_hash: 7ab9d9fe2deb0382f9aad1d79ac29789b397e5e7994bd02bc57c8a62e5021898
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TJ0350_INF
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-30T17:03:08Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-30T21:01:02.165786Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-30T21:04:12Z'
status: published
content_hash: d1e6506ee51229f4565c8d6e33f31469977ab036c9080cc6107d58680b3ea3a5
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TJ0350_INF),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: EUの商標に関する異議申し立てで、申請者のBLUE PADELは既存のBULLPADELなどの商標と誤認の可能性があるため拒否された。一般裁判所は、関連する要因間の相互依存性を考慮し、第8条(1)項(b)に基づき異議が適切だったとして決定した。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: EUの商標に関する異議申し立てで、申請者のBLUE PADELは既存のBULLPADELなどの商標と誤認の可能性があるため拒否された。一般裁判所は、関連する要因間の相互依存性を考慮し、第8条(1)項(b)に基づき異議が適切だったとして決定した。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62025TJ0350_INF
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: THE ANSWER
  type: organization
- name: general_news
  type: concept
- name: immigration courts
  type: location
- name: First Secretary
  type: person
- name: Chamber of Deputies
  type: UNKNOWN
- name: July
  type: event
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: BBC
  type: organization
  weight: 2.0
- name: trump
  type: person
  weight: 2.0
- name: Heat
  type: UNKNOWN
  weight: 1.0
- name: Parental_Guidance
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Accessibility_Help
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Aguirre y Compañía,
  SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings
  – Application for EU word mark BLUE PADEL – Earlier EU figurative marks BULLPADEL
  – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence between
  factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-350/25.
---

# Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Aguirre y Compañía, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BLUE PADEL – Earlier EU figurative marks BULLPADEL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence between factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-350/25.

## TL;DR
EUの商標に関する異議申し立てで、申請者のBLUE PADELは既存のBULLPADELなどの商標と誤認の可能性があるため拒否された。一般裁判所は、関連する要因間の相互依存性を考慮し、第8条(1)項(b)に基づき異議が適切だったとして決定した。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 July 2026.#Aguirre y Compañía, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark BLUE PADEL – Earlier EU figurative marks BULLPADEL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence between factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-350/25.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TJ0350_INF) — published 2026-07-30T17:03:08Z