---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260730-619677
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024TJ0365_INF
url_hash: 619677a8897b792ac0ad2d2f1562f6da335908d86e87cb3094f664ed345999f2
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024TJ0365_INF
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-30T17:03:08Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-30T21:01:02.151586Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-30T21:04:12Z'
status: published
content_hash: b626a9294850c68dfda1cec64054634aa3eea64ceb12b3d654859076c801fe89
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024TJ0365_INF),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: EU投資銀行（EIB）の職員であるLU氏が心理的嫌がらせを主張し、行政調査を求める申請を拒否されたことについて、EIB側の決定は取り消すことができず、その行為は争いの対象外とされた。また、手続き上必要な理由付け義務は履行されていないため、責任が生じる可能性がある。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: EU投資銀行（EIB）の職員であるLU氏が心理的嫌がらせを主張し、行政調査を求める申請を拒否されたことについて、EIB側の決定は取り消すことができず、その行為は争いの対象外とされた。また、手続き上必要な理由付け義務は履行されていないため、責任が生じる可能性がある。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024TJ0365_INF
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: THE ANSWER
  type: organization
- name: general_news
  type: concept
- name: immigration courts
  type: location
- name: Chamber of Deputies
  type: UNKNOWN
- name: European Commission
  type: organization
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: BBC
  type: organization
  weight: 2.0
- name: trump
  type: person
  weight: 2.0
- name: Heat
  type: UNKNOWN
  weight: 1.0
- name: Parental_Guidance
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Accessibility_Help
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European
  Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative
  inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate
  disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory
  act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case
  T-365/24.
---

# Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-365/24.

## TL;DR
EU投資銀行（EIB）の職員であるLU氏が心理的嫌がらせを主張し、行政調査を求める申請を拒否されたことについて、EIB側の決定は取り消すことができず、その行為は争いの対象外とされた。また、手続き上必要な理由付け義務は履行されていないため、責任が生じる可能性がある。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-365/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024TJ0365_INF) — published 2026-07-30T17:03:08Z