---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260726-a939cd
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0147
url_hash: a939cd85f48319aa8c6a7e22b83c1960ba12213c32f16e90c312b8f45609e07c
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0147
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: official-journal-c
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-26T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:56.900161Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-27T03:20:28Z'
status: published
content_hash: d14c7fbcf7abd6f2e69fd82baeca679b64b180547a2771b4b64a3692c707665a
content_changed_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:58.337863Z'
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0147),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: "ケースC-147/24 Safi判決は、親が未成年子供を持つ第三国籍者の帰属住宅権を拒否し、別国へ移動命令したことでEU市民の自由行為権と児童最善利益を侵害したと認定。\
  \  \n親が別国に移動する必要があり、子供は他のEU加盟国に住んでいない状況が問題視された。  \n判決は、EU憲法および基本人権条約の保護を強調し、適切な対応を求めた。"
summary_source: llm
summary_en: "ケースC-147/24 Safi判決は、親が未成年子供を持つ第三国籍者の帰属住宅権を拒否し、別国へ移動命令したことでEU市民の自由行為権と児童最善利益を侵害したと認定。\
  \  \n親が別国に移動する必要があり、子供は他のEU加盟国に住んでいない状況が問題視された。  \n判決は、EU憲法および基本人権条約の保護を強調し、適切な対応を求めた。"
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CA0147
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Publications Office of the European Union
  doc_type: official-journal-c
  feed_title: 6 - Acts of the Official Journal C
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: Grandfather
  type: person
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
- name: ブランドメンバー
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: 複合展示会
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: 試遊コーナーの設営
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case C-147/24, Safi: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026
  (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, sitting at Roermond –
  Netherlands) – V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a
  preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC –
  Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation
  to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) –
  Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a
  derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is
  the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country
  national to go immediately to another Member State – Interference with the exercise
  by a Union citizen of his or her right of free movement and residence within the
  territory of the Member States – Child having never resided in a Member State other
  than that of which he or she is a national – Derived right of residence of the parent,
  who is a third-country national, in the Member State of which the child is a national
  and in which that child resides – Right of residence of that parent in another Member
  State – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right
  to respect for private and family life – Article 24(2) and (3) of the Charter of
  Fundamental Rights – Best interests of the child)'
---

# Case C-147/24, Safi: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, sitting at Roermond – Netherlands) – V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) – Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country national to go immediately to another Member State – Interference with the exercise by a Union citizen of his or her right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States – Child having never resided in a Member State other than that of which he or she is a national – Derived right of residence of the parent, who is a third-country national, in the Member State of which the child is a national and in which that child resides – Right of residence of that parent in another Member State – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life – Article 24(2) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Best interests of the child)

## TL;DR
ケースC-147/24 Safi判決は、親が未成年子供を持つ第三国籍者の帰属住宅権を拒否し、別国へ移動命令したことでEU市民の自由行為権と児童最善利益を侵害したと認定。  
親が別国に移動する必要があり、子供は他のEU加盟国に住んでいない状況が問題視された。  
判決は、EU憲法および基本人権条約の保護を強調し、適切な対応を求めた。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case C-147/24, Safi: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, sitting at Roermond – Netherlands) – V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) – Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country national to go immediately to another Member State – Interference with the exercise by a Union citizen of his or her right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States – Child having never resided in a Member State other than that of which he or she is a national – Derived right of residence of the parent, who is a third-country national, in the Member State of which the child is a national and in which that child resides – Right of residence of that parent in another Member State – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life – Article 24(2) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Best interests of the child)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0147) — published 2026-07-26T22:00:00Z