---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260726-543b9c
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024TA0659
url_hash: 543b9c66c8f05e284a6f8e43a6610308a0446a6513572345bdb6d8410cede74f
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024TA0659
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-26T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:56.765231Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-27T03:20:28Z'
status: published
content_hash: 1ca721ada8e1ded0cfb7fbbe3be795316fdb8da5cc1b7221c76258572083865f
content_changed_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:58.020246Z'
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024TA0659),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: "一般裁判は、フランスのガンジュトラワーが保護区域で引き網を使用することを禁止する規定に違反すると判断し、誤った法的評価とみなす。  \nブロム社は、EU法の適用ミスにより海洋生物保護規制から免除される権利を主張したが、一般裁判所はそれを否定した。\
  \  \nこの判決は、2024年1382号実施規則に基づくガンジュトラワーの許可が不当であると結論付けた。"
summary_source: llm
summary_en: "一般裁判は、フランスのガンジュトラワーが保護区域で引き網を使用することを禁止する規定に違反すると判断し、誤った法的評価とみなす。  \n\
  ブロム社は、EU法の適用ミスにより海洋生物保護規制から免除される権利を主張したが、一般裁判所はそれを否定した。  \nこの判決は、2024年1382号実施規則に基づくガンジュトラワーの許可が不当であると結論付けた。"
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024TA0659
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: biz_general
  type: TopicSub
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: Bloomberg
  type: organization
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: domestic_politics
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: sci_environment
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
- name: ブランドメンバー
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case T-659/24: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – Bloom v Commission
  (Common fisheries policy – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1382 – Derogation from
  Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 as regards the prohibition to fish with towed gear
  above protected habitats for gangui trawlers fishing in certain territorial waters
  of France – Article 4(1), (2), (4) and (5) of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Possibility
  of derogating from the prohibition to fish with towed gear in an area designated
  as a Natura 2000 site for the conservation of one or more habitats protected under
  Article 4 of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 –
  Error of law – Manifest error of assessment)'
---

# Case T-659/24: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – Bloom v Commission (Common fisheries policy – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1382 – Derogation from Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 as regards the prohibition to fish with towed gear above protected habitats for gangui trawlers fishing in certain territorial waters of France – Article 4(1), (2), (4) and (5) of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Possibility of derogating from the prohibition to fish with towed gear in an area designated as a Natura 2000 site for the conservation of one or more habitats protected under Article 4 of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment)

## TL;DR
一般裁判は、フランスのガンジュトラワーが保護区域で引き網を使用することを禁止する規定に違反すると判断し、誤った法的評価とみなす。  
ブロム社は、EU法の適用ミスにより海洋生物保護規制から免除される権利を主張したが、一般裁判所はそれを否定した。  
この判決は、2024年1382号実施規則に基づくガンジュトラワーの許可が不当であると結論付けた。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case T-659/24: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – Bloom v Commission (Common fisheries policy – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1382 – Derogation from Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 as regards the prohibition to fish with towed gear above protected habitats for gangui trawlers fishing in certain territorial waters of France – Article 4(1), (2), (4) and (5) of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Possibility of derogating from the prohibition to fish with towed gear in an area designated as a Natura 2000 site for the conservation of one or more habitats protected under Article 4 of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024TA0659) — published 2026-07-26T22:00:00Z