---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260726-418cad
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TA0099
url_hash: 418cadb0d65ec2a96991afe93a6a5e3e736a4f5758ce13428119aec4343ba832
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TA0099
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-26T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:55.856668Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-27T03:05:41Z'
status: published
content_hash: e78a349435cf272f53867fcb96c23ef7adc55e2a34cd3477fc8665a12e78308a
content_changed_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:56.943317Z'
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TA0099),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: 欧州公共検察庁は、欧州監査法院が捜査における証人としての発言を許可するための秘密保持義務の解除を拒否した行為を無効とする異議申し立てを行った。一般裁判所はその行為が協力義務違反であり、無効であると判断した。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: 欧州公共検察庁は、欧州監査法院が捜査における証人としての発言を許可するための秘密保持義務の解除を拒否した行為を無効とする異議申し立てを行った。一般裁判所はその行為が協力義務違反であり、無効であると判断した。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62025TA0099
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: biz_general
  type: TopicSub
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: European Central Bank
  type: organization
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: domestic_politics
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: sci_environment
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: Christine Lagarde
  type: person
  weight: 2.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case T-99/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – European Public
  Prosecutor’s Office v European Court of Auditors (Law governing the institutions –
  Investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Refusal by the Court
  of Auditors to lift the duty of confidentiality of persons called to be heard as
  witnesses in the investigation – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility –
  Cooperation in good faith – Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Interests of the
  Union)'
---

# Case T-99/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office v European Court of Auditors (Law governing the institutions – Investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Refusal by the Court of Auditors to lift the duty of confidentiality of persons called to be heard as witnesses in the investigation – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Cooperation in good faith – Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Interests of the Union)

## TL;DR
欧州公共検察庁は、欧州監査法院が捜査における証人としての発言を許可するための秘密保持義務の解除を拒否した行為を無効とする異議申し立てを行った。一般裁判所はその行為が協力義務違反であり、無効であると判断した。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case T-99/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office v European Court of Auditors (Law governing the institutions – Investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Refusal by the Court of Auditors to lift the duty of confidentiality of persons called to be heard as witnesses in the investigation – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Cooperation in good faith – Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Interests of the Union)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TA0099) — published 2026-07-26T22:00:00Z