---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260726-1bab96
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62023CA0722
url_hash: 1bab9679df89c760498c6d75dc451811879a16b46ccb23a3ec4ed41aba6d1d50
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62023CA0722
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-26T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:56.567799Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-27T03:16:15Z'
status: published
content_hash: eb6010107a2765b09bd9c76fa67a6e4f6cd6c9601cd328eb7133f0fec9397c1e
content_changed_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:57.701827Z'
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62023CA0722),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: 欧州逮捕令の執行拒否において、被求め人の人道的待遇の禁止を理由にした選択的非執行根拠を追加してはならない。執行国は、その代替として、相互承認に基づく判決の提出を発動する義務がある。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: 欧州逮捕令の執行拒否において、被求め人の人道的待遇の禁止を理由にした選択的非執行根拠を追加してはならない。執行国は、その代替として、相互承認に基づく判決の提出を発動する義務がある。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62023CA0722
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: Anderson Taylor
  type: person
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto: []
title: 'Joined Cases C-722/23 and C-91/24, Rugu and Aucroix: Judgment of the Court
  (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court
  of Cassation – Belgium) – proceedings relating to the execution of European arrest
  warrants (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal
  matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) –
  Grounds for refusal of execution – Risk of the requested person suffering inhuman
  or degrading treatment prohibited by Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
  of the European Union – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution – Undertaking
  of the Member State to enforce the sentence in accordance with its domestic law –
  Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters –
  Article 4(5) – Request by the executing Member State to the issuing Member State
  to forward to it the judgment imposing a custodial sentence with a view to enforcing
  that sentence on its territory)'
---

# Joined Cases C-722/23 and C-91/24, Rugu and Aucroix: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Cassation – Belgium) – proceedings relating to the execution of European arrest warrants (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Grounds for refusal of execution – Risk of the requested person suffering inhuman or degrading treatment prohibited by Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution – Undertaking of the Member State to enforce the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters – Article 4(5) – Request by the executing Member State to the issuing Member State to forward to it the judgment imposing a custodial sentence with a view to enforcing that sentence on its territory)

## TL;DR
欧州逮捕令の執行拒否において、被求め人の人道的待遇の禁止を理由にした選択的非執行根拠を追加してはならない。執行国は、その代替として、相互承認に基づく判決の提出を発動する義務がある。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Joined Cases C-722/23 and C-91/24, Rugu and Aucroix: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Cassation – Belgium) – proceedings relating to the execution of European arrest warrants (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Grounds for refusal of execution – Risk of the requested person suffering inhuman or degrading treatment prohibited by Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution – Undertaking of the Member State to enforce the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters – Article 4(5) – Request by the executing Member State to the issuing Member State to forward to it the judgment imposing a custodial sentence with a view to enforcing that sentence on its territory)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62023CA0722) — published 2026-07-26T22:00:00Z