---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260726-085336
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CA0440
url_hash: 08533665a0d1be46366522ef606bc70871a43a6b9952687586c96cb1887ad49c
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CA0440
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: official-journal-c
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-26T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:57.088841Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-27T03:24:30Z'
status: published
content_hash: a69bc2ff8dea7217bc2723fd042283df3310c5d10f85f36cea1fc88646cd2ff6
content_changed_at: '2026-07-27T03:00:58.436180Z'
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CA0440),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: 欧州連合法院は2026年6月4日、ネ덜ランドの裁判所からの予備的尋問を受けて、難民認定手続きにおける初審裁判所の権限や効果的な救済権の保障について判断しました。初審裁判所が事実の検証や国際保護の必要性の評価を行う義務があると裁定し、難民状態または補助的保護状態の認定基準も明確化しました。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: 欧州連合法院は2026年6月4日、ネ덜ランドの裁判所からの予備的尋問を受けて、難民認定手続きにおける初審裁判所の権限や効果的な救済権の保障について判断しました。初審裁判所が事実の検証や国際保護の必要性の評価を行う義務があると裁定し、難民状態または補助的保護状態の認定基準も明確化しました。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62025CA0440
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Publications Office of the European Union
  doc_type: official-journal-c
  feed_title: 6 - Acts of the Official Journal C
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
- name: ブランドメンバー
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: 複合展示会
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: 試遊コーナーの設営
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case C-440/25, Ebilum: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026
  (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Zwolle –
  Netherlands) – PM, QN, RM, SM, TM, UM, VM and WM v Minister van Asiel en Migratie
  (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum
  policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection –
  Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc
  examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination
  of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international
  protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary
  protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country
  nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – Well-founded fear
  of being persecuted – Assessment)'
---

# Case C-440/25, Ebilum: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Zwolle – Netherlands) – PM, QN, RM, SM, TM, UM, VM and WM v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – Well-founded fear of being persecuted – Assessment)

## TL;DR
欧州連合法院は2026年6月4日、ネ덜ランドの裁判所からの予備的尋問を受けて、難民認定手続きにおける初審裁判所の権限や効果的な救済権の保障について判断しました。初審裁判所が事実の検証や国際保護の必要性の評価を行う義務があると裁定し、難民状態または補助的保護状態の認定基準も明確化しました。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case C-440/25, Ebilum: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Zwolle – Netherlands) – PM, QN, RM, SM, TM, UM, VM and WM v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – Well-founded fear of being persecuted – Assessment)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CA0440) — published 2026-07-26T22:00:00Z