---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-f3eb8f
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0768
url_hash: f3eb8f0adcab0f7fff6bfb66ec17fd79b5bd48300df31a42c63ba1f0502d5c4a
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0768
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:36Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:37.468949Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:15:26Z'
status: published
content_hash: 3f62b73b9c490c8560b1cab892898fd24ed62cd0dfca448d5bb0c7048cb98ecd
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0768),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: 欧州法院は、雇用契約における法的選択肢の有無に関わらず、労働者の保護を確保するための義務法規が適用されるべきと判断。雇用者が通常業務を行う国または業務執行を通じた事業所がある国の法律が優先される。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: 欧州法院は、雇用契約における法的選択肢の有無に関わらず、労働者の保護を確保するための義務法規が適用されるべきと判断。雇用者が通常業務を行う国または業務執行を通じた事業所がある国の法律が優先される。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CJ0768
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: July 24th 2026
  type: UNKNOWN
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: KAMISABI展示
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: 複合展示会
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: 試遊コーナーの設営
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: アイドルグループ
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Hortis GRC SA v JA
  and France Travail Île-de-France, anciennement Pôle emploi Île-de-France.#Reference
  for a preliminary ruling – Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations
  – Article 3 – Choice made by the parties – Article 6 – Contract of employment –
  Mandatory rules of the law which would be applicable in the absence of choice –
  Determination of the applicable law – Contract of employment more closely connected
  with another country – Criteria for assessment – Closer connections resulting, in
  the performance of a contract of employment, from the parties’ choice of the law
  applicable to that contract.#Case C-768/24.
---

# Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Hortis GRC SA v JA and France Travail Île-de-France, anciennement Pôle emploi Île-de-France.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations – Article 3 – Choice made by the parties – Article 6 – Contract of employment – Mandatory rules of the law which would be applicable in the absence of choice – Determination of the applicable law – Contract of employment more closely connected with another country – Criteria for assessment – Closer connections resulting, in the performance of a contract of employment, from the parties’ choice of the law applicable to that contract.#Case C-768/24.

## TL;DR
欧州法院は、雇用契約における法的選択肢の有無に関わらず、労働者の保護を確保するための義務法規が適用されるべきと判断。雇用者が通常業務を行う国または業務執行を通じた事業所がある国の法律が優先される。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Hortis GRC SA v JA and France Travail Île-de-France, anciennement Pôle emploi Île-de-France.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations – Article 3 – Choice made by the parties – Article 6 – Contract of employment – Mandatory rules of the law which would be applicable in the absence of choice – Determination of the applicable law – Contract of employment more closely connected with another country – Criteria for assessment – Closer connections resulting, in the performance of a contract of employment, from the parties’ choice of the law applicable to that contract.#Case C-768/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0768) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:36Z