---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-e2d472
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CO0255
url_hash: e2d4724b57ef4c6045361431c1df50f04c67c04411e2d5620841557579125535
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CO0255
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:36Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:37.620673Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:15:26Z'
status: published
content_hash: 97807144b44a9a9c5817e5a06eee95d8fa1ccf279bd34a01d935c7163e64453e
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CO0255),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: Greeceの公的投資援助制度がEU法と相容れるかを尋ねた裁判で、権利侵害があった場合に効果的な救済が保障されることを示唆する。技ニケス・エコレセットAEが地域開発支援を拒否されたが、その決定は法的根拠がないと判断され、個人の権利侵害として扱われる可能性がある。EUの基本的人権保障が守られるために、適切な補償が必要である。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: Greeceの公的投資援助制度がEU法と相容れるかを尋ねた裁判で、権利侵害があった場合に効果的な救済が保障されることを示唆する。技ニケス・エコレセットAEが地域開発支援を拒否されたが、その決定は法的根拠がないと判断され、個人の権利侵害として扱われる可能性がある。EUの基本的人権保障が守られるために、適切な補償が必要である。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62025CO0255
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: border authorities
  type: organization
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: U.S. citizen
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: KAMISABI展示
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: 複合展示会
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: 試遊コーナーの設営
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
title: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai
  Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary
  ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which
  may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme –
  Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority
  to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal
  decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision
  – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the
  aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been
  granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
  – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1
  – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.
---

# Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.

## TL;DR
Greeceの公的投資援助制度がEU法と相容れるかを尋ねた裁判で、権利侵害があった場合に効果的な救済が保障されることを示唆する。技ニケス・エコレセットAEが地域開発支援を拒否されたが、その決定は法的根拠がないと判断され、個人の権利侵害として扱われる可能性がある。EUの基本的人権保障が守られるために、適切な補償が必要である。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CO0255) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:36Z