---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-c5b526
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0771
url_hash: c5b526021f4cb4cf57a78f046766dbfab350455de148e58ec8abcff3e94946a0
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0771
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:36Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:37.556543Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:15:26Z'
status: published
content_hash: b1b3348da9b59e22ffe300becc7a57c2f673641bb6ee4debbe1e435b15f26b1b
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0771),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: Court upholds EU Directive 2001/42 requires environmental impact assessments
  for car park plans; Belgian region's order may be invalid if it bypasses such assessments.
  The ruling clarifies 'plans and programmes' under Article 3(2)(a) as sector-wide
  frameworks, not isolated projects. Decision aligns with sustainable development
  principles.
summary_source: llm
summary_en: Court upholds EU Directive 2001/42 requires environmental impact assessments
  for car park plans; Belgian region's order may be invalid if it bypasses such assessments.
  The ruling clarifies 'plans and programmes' under Article 3(2)(a) as sector-wide
  frameworks, not isolated projects. Decision aligns with sustainable development
  principles.
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CJ0771
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: July 24th 2026
  type: UNKNOWN
- name: operation
  type: event
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: KAMISABI展示
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: 複合展示会
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: 試遊コーナーの設営
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: アイドルグループ
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Fédération belge du
  stationnement ASBL and Interparking SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, représentée
  par son Gouvernement.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive
  2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment
  – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Measures
  prepared for certain sectors and setting a framework for future development consent
  of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 2011/92/EU – Plan or programme
  in the transport, town and country planning or land use sector – Order laying down
  the conditions for operating car parks – Maintenance of the effects of a national
  act where there is no environmental impact assessment – Conditions.#Case C-771/24.
---

# Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Fédération belge du stationnement ASBL and Interparking SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, représentée par son Gouvernement.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Measures prepared for certain sectors and setting a framework for future development consent of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 2011/92/EU – Plan or programme in the transport, town and country planning or land use sector – Order laying down the conditions for operating car parks – Maintenance of the effects of a national act where there is no environmental impact assessment – Conditions.#Case C-771/24.

## TL;DR
Court upholds EU Directive 2001/42 requires environmental impact assessments for car park plans; Belgian region's order may be invalid if it bypasses such assessments. The ruling clarifies 'plans and programmes' under Article 3(2)(a) as sector-wide frameworks, not isolated projects. Decision aligns with sustainable development principles.

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Fédération belge du stationnement ASBL and Interparking SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, représentée par son Gouvernement.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Measures prepared for certain sectors and setting a framework for future development consent of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 2011/92/EU – Plan or programme in the transport, town and country planning or land use sector – Order laying down the conditions for operating car parks – Maintenance of the effects of a national act where there is no environmental impact assessment – Conditions.#Case C-771/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0771) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:36Z