---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-923d90
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CO0255_SUM
url_hash: 923d90532fe31f38c42488dbdac12b8def388b65465b4a2c6c4bf0e8db6a4958
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CO0255_SUM
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:20Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:39:39.692231Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T17:45:51Z'
status: published
content_hash: df35033ac6c08b627e9217790e385c59c2acec299d61094e192028d78c546c0b
content_changed_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:37.728271Z'
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CO0255_SUM),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: null
summary_source: unavailable
summary_en: null
provenance:
  doc_id: 62025CO0255_SUM
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: border authorities
  type: organization
- name: THE FIRST TAKE
  type: content
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: U.S. citizen
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: グッタイム
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Bluesky
  type: concept
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_openclaw
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
title: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai
  Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary
  ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which
  may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme –
  Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority
  to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal
  decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision
  – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the
  aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been
  granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
  – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1
  – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.
---

# Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.

## TL;DR
（要約なし・原文はリンク先を参照 / No summary available; see the source link.）

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CO0255_SUM) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:20Z