---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-8baac8
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0196
url_hash: 8baac87a62b03e07ad19f25b1635d37b55cbd357b199aeb3884c031d5c78d029
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0196
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:38Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:36.307417Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T17:55:23Z'
status: published
content_hash: 877148b1cd1d0e67d1012428f1b923c13aa5b7ac27fda478afd13bc17969bf80
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0196),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: null
summary_source: unavailable
summary_en: null
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CJ0196
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: Human judgment
  type: concept
- name: THE FIRST TAKE
  type: content
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: Grandfather
  type: person
- name: July 22nd 2026
  type: event
- name: Anderson Taylor
  type: person
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: グッタイム
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Bluesky
  type: concept
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_openclaw
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: Grandson
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference
  for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation
  between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation
  (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution
  of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to
  execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State –
  Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of
  the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of
  establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter
  of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for human dignity
  – Right to know one’s genetic origins.#Case C-196/24.
---

# Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State – Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for human dignity – Right to know one’s genetic origins.#Case C-196/24.

## TL;DR
（要約なし・原文はリンク先を参照 / No summary available; see the source link.）

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State – Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for human dignity – Right to know one’s genetic origins.#Case C-196/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0196) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:38Z