---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-73064a
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0424
url_hash: 73064a3ba97deaf097547276f4a2c9e1dfe0d5b63891d1015edcfccb0efdc31f
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0424
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:38Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:36.327461Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T17:55:23Z'
status: published
content_hash: 1d35bb2ff716800a8a1a7e34164ba5a60898b68b2e4a5f2bcf5403419935afe7
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0424),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: null
summary_source: unavailable
summary_en: null
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CJ0424
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: Human judgment
  type: concept
- name: THE FIRST TAKE
  type: content
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: July 22nd 2026
  type: event
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: グッタイム
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Bluesky
  type: concept
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_openclaw
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD v Federazione Italiana
  Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary
  sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain
  professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors
  of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving
  false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56
  TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide
  services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper
  conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality
  – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory,
  proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU
  – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
  of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective
  judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over
  the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to
  the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Case
  C-424/24.
---

# Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Case C-424/24.

## TL;DR
（要約なし・原文はリンク先を参照 / No summary available; see the source link.）

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Case C-424/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0424) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:38Z