---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-5b8d08
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0788
url_hash: 5b8d08dc34edc0e768d66e97c25aed2ff5f2970c002f4e16b02268a499d1d3bb
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0788
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:36Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:37.483719Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:15:26Z'
status: published
content_hash: 43b59a01bb2615267e7c06f2cda3e299a7aefad74dfe21ab5541818e25e362ae
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0788),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: 欧州連合法院は、著作権保護期間が異なる国間で作品をウェブサイトに掲載し、地理制限によるアクセス制御を行う行為について、通信の公衆送信の定義と技術的措置の有効性を判断しました。VPNなどの手段でその制限を回避できる場合でも、著作権保護が続く国での利用は許容される可能性があります。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: 欧州連合法院は、著作権保護期間が異なる国間で作品をウェブサイトに掲載し、地理制限によるアクセス制御を行う行為について、通信の公衆送信の定義と技術的措置の有効性を判断しました。VPNなどの手段でその制限を回避できる場合でも、著作権保護が続く国での利用は許容される可能性があります。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CJ0788
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: July 24th 2026
  type: UNKNOWN
- name: YouTube Channel
  type: organization
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: KAMISABI展示
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: 複合展示会
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: 試遊コーナーの設営
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: アイドルグループ
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds v Anne
  Frank Stichting and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property
  – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of
  ‘communication to the public’ – Article 6(3) – Effective technological measures
  – Work that is in the public domain in certain Member States and still protected
  by copyright in another Member State – Publication of that work on a website – Geo-blocking
  measure designed to prevent access to that website from the Member State in which
  the work is still protected – Possibility of circumventing that measure by means
  of a virtual private network (VPN) or similar service.#Case C-788/24.
---

# Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds v Anne Frank Stichting and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Article 6(3) – Effective technological measures – Work that is in the public domain in certain Member States and still protected by copyright in another Member State – Publication of that work on a website – Geo-blocking measure designed to prevent access to that website from the Member State in which the work is still protected – Possibility of circumventing that measure by means of a virtual private network (VPN) or similar service.#Case C-788/24.

## TL;DR
欧州連合法院は、著作権保護期間が異なる国間で作品をウェブサイトに掲載し、地理制限によるアクセス制御を行う行為について、通信の公衆送信の定義と技術的措置の有効性を判断しました。VPNなどの手段でその制限を回避できる場合でも、著作権保護が続く国での利用は許容される可能性があります。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds v Anne Frank Stichting and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Article 6(3) – Effective technological measures – Work that is in the public domain in certain Member States and still protected by copyright in another Member State – Publication of that work on a website – Geo-blocking measure designed to prevent access to that website from the Member State in which the work is still protected – Possibility of circumventing that measure by means of a virtual private network (VPN) or similar service.#Case C-788/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0788) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:36Z