---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-40ccd9
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0424_RES
url_hash: 40ccd98887439455b24dd5a077b04c14f0211d7c00a49043d523fde65e17aae9
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0424_RES
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:37Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:36.687920Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T17:56:45Z'
status: published
content_hash: d0ea59f97efdc8042bee454f19f54853017bfba9bf98cf4725d2e97ed6fa216c
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0424_RES),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: null
summary_source: unavailable
summary_en: null
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CJ0424_RES
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: Human judgment
  type: concept
- name: THE FIRST TAKE
  type: content
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: July 22nd 2026
  type: event
- name: Anderson Taylor
  type: person
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: グッタイム
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Bluesky
  type: concept
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_openclaw
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD and MI v Federazione
  Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling –
  Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit
  of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on
  two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making
  or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles
  45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom
  to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest
  – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality
  – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory,
  proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU
  – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
  of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective
  judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over
  the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to
  the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Joined
  Cases C-424/24 and C-425/24.
---

# Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD and MI v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Joined Cases C-424/24 and C-425/24.

## TL;DR
（要約なし・原文はリンク先を参照 / No summary available; see the source link.）

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#ZD and MI v Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Disciplinary sanctions in the area of sport – Temporary prohibition on the pursuit of certain professional activities, imposed by a national sports association on two directors of a professional football club – Infringement consisting in making or approving false financial and accounting statements – Internal market – Articles 45 and 56 TFEU – Obstacle to the freedom of movement for workers and the freedom to provide services – Whether justified – Legitimate objective in the public interest – Proper conduct of sporting competitions – Observance of the principle of proportionality – Determination of sanctions – Existence of transparent, objective, non-discriminatory, proportionate and verifiable criteria – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether there is effective judicial review – National legislation allowing the court having jurisdiction over the indirect review of the lawfulness of those sanctions to award compensation to the persons subject to sanctions but not to annul or suspend those sanctions.#Joined Cases C-424/24 and C-425/24.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0424_RES) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:37Z