---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260725-3caa8b
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62023CJ0258_RES
url_hash: 3caa8bbd32eadc1a003d2c8beaeafe0d2bc210f3c3c00759b48dad644958413b
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62023CJ0258_RES
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:38Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:36.289776Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T17:52:06Z'
status: published
content_hash: e1874ac6848c7ae6e89894b006c13eb18c41c5ef90584a665cd44415d026d6f4
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62023CJ0258_RES),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: null
summary_source: unavailable
summary_en: null
provenance:
  doc_id: 62023CJ0258_RES
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice
entities:
- name: Human judgment
  type: concept
- name: THE FIRST TAKE
  type: content
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
- name: Grandfather
  type: person
- name: July 22nd 2026
  type: event
- name: Kimi
  type: concept
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: Moonshot AI
  type: organization
  weight: 2.0
- name: グッタイム
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Bluesky
  type: concept
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_openclaw
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
- name: Grandson
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
title: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas
  Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary
  ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of
  a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national
  competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering
  an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of
  business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public
  Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
  European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to
  the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation
  by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.
---

# Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.

## TL;DR
（要約なし・原文はリンク先を参照 / No summary available; see the source link.）

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural requirements – No prior authorisation by a court.#Joined Cases C-258/23 to C-260/23.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62023CJ0258_RES) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:38Z