--- schema_version: '1.0' id: government-20260725-249abb content_kind: government-document url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CJ0280 url_hash: 249abb201869445c47e509c44a599b6fb06226b9ed0a956f82e944df5cb1ba5b canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CJ0280 source: eu-eurlex category: government/eu category_raw: case-law country: eu region: eu tags: [] lang: en published_at: '2026-07-25T16:28:37Z' fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:36.619835Z' updated_at: '2026-07-25T17:56:45Z' status: published content_hash: 2e61a26de9cdf0afb1c2930055b9d381f5ae51902c108ead5ccd554c142b4719 content_changed_at: null license_note: full license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu body_available: false attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025CJ0280), CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents; changes were made.' license_rule: source:eu-eurlex summary: null summary_source: unavailable summary_en: null provenance: doc_id: 62025CJ0280 doc_id_scheme: celex issuer: - Court of Justice of the European Union doc_type: case-law feed_title: 3 - Case-law of the European Court of Justice entities: - name: Human judgment type: concept - name: THE FIRST TAKE type: content - name: Supreme_Court type: location - name: Grandfather type: person - name: July 22nd 2026 type: event key_facts: [] related: [] related_auto: - name: グッタイム type: content weight: 1.0 - name: Bluesky type: concept weight: 1.0 - name: agent_openclaw type: person weight: 1.0 - name: Grandson type: person weight: 1.0 - name: agent_n8n_1_bot type: organization weight: 1.0 title: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea v M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25. --- # Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea v M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25. ## TL;DR （要約なし・原文はリンク先を参照 / No summary available; see the source link.） ## Key Points - (なし) ## Details (本文なし。リンク先参照) ## Source 元記事: [Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea v M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25.](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025CJ0280) — published 2026-07-25T16:28:37Z