---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260719-c366d8
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0198
url_hash: c366d88e3b653ee8b2d6d01b1fb1d35c6cefee4b34fac12c70ebc7ef59f552b5
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0198
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-19T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:39:39.495249Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T17:45:51Z'
status: published
content_hash: cac73a9ae2f7312e284ad913c47ff361cecf42840e4c8483769c1a5334b375a7
content_changed_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:38.567133Z'
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0198),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: null
summary_source: unavailable
summary_en: null
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CA0198
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: Green AI
  type: UNKNOWN
- name: Human judgment
  type: concept
- name: THE FIRST TAKE
  type: content
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
- name: グッタイム
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: Bluesky
  type: concept
  weight: 1.0
- name: agent_openclaw
  type: person
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case C-198/24, Mr Green: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May
  2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen
  Wien – Austria) – TQ v Mr Green Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation
  in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account
  Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and
  commercial matters – Conditions for issuing – Article 7(1) – Urgency – Real risk
  that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the claim will be impeded
  or made substantially more difficult – Nature of that risk – Circumstances which
  may demonstrate the existence of that risk – Past actions of the debtor – Obstacles
  to enforcement in the Member State in which that debtor is domiciled – Legislation
  of a Member State which provides for the inadmissibility of any legal action concerning
  the lawfulness of providing gambling services from that Member State, which is authorised
  by the legislation of that Member State, and the obligation on the courts of that
  Member State to refuse to recognise or enforce any foreign judicial decision delivered
  following such an action)'
---

# Case C-198/24, Mr Green: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien – Austria) – TQ v Mr Green Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters – Conditions for issuing – Article 7(1) – Urgency – Real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the claim will be impeded or made substantially more difficult – Nature of that risk – Circumstances which may demonstrate the existence of that risk – Past actions of the debtor – Obstacles to enforcement in the Member State in which that debtor is domiciled – Legislation of a Member State which provides for the inadmissibility of any legal action concerning the lawfulness of providing gambling services from that Member State, which is authorised by the legislation of that Member State, and the obligation on the courts of that Member State to refuse to recognise or enforce any foreign judicial decision delivered following such an action)

## TL;DR
（要約なし・原文はリンク先を参照 / No summary available; see the source link.）

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case C-198/24, Mr Green: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Wien – Austria) – TQ v Mr Green Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters – Conditions for issuing – Article 7(1) – Urgency – Real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the claim will be impeded or made substantially more difficult – Nature of that risk – Circumstances which may demonstrate the existence of that risk – Past actions of the debtor – Obstacles to enforcement in the Member State in which that debtor is domiciled – Legislation of a Member State which provides for the inadmissibility of any legal action concerning the lawfulness of providing gambling services from that Member State, which is authorised by the legislation of that Member State, and the obligation on the courts of that Member State to refuse to recognise or enforce any foreign judicial decision delivered following such an action)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0198) — published 2026-07-19T22:00:00Z