--- schema_version: '1.0' id: government-20260719-bdcc8f content_kind: government-document url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0447 url_hash: bdcc8f12abc2a8321daad9a21186b92a39593c794a7ff1a6aa8cb7194dd7c522 canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0447 source: eu-eurlex category: government/eu category_raw: case-law country: eu region: eu tags: [] lang: en published_at: '2026-07-19T22:00:00Z' fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:39.018626Z' updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:26:32Z' status: published content_hash: 69f7cda7b615ea9a5a7dacfcb6dfc3152c01630566426392044f2e13767cd44b content_changed_at: null license_note: full license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu body_available: false attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0447), CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents; changes were made.' license_rule: source:eu-eurlex summary: "ドイツのKammergerichtは、被告が裁判に出席しなかったことで有罪判決を受けたことを認めず、EU法との整合性を保つために判決を否定した。\ \ \n被告が証拠や手続きについて完全に同意した場合、執行国は判決を無効化する権利がある。 \n裁判所は、個人の権利を尊重しながらEU法の適用を確保することを義務付けた。" summary_source: llm summary_en: "ドイツのKammergerichtは、被告が裁判に出席しなかったことで有罪判決を受けたことを認めず、EU法との整合性を保つために判決を否定した。\ \ \n被告が証拠や手続きについて完全に同意した場合、執行国は判決を無効化する権利がある。 \n裁判所は、個人の権利を尊重しながらEU法の適用を確保することを義務付けた。" provenance: doc_id: 62024CA0447 doc_id_scheme: celex issuer: - Court of Justice of the European Union doc_type: case-law feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union entities: - name: DalecaSealanked type: person - name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE type: event - name: Supreme_Court type: location key_facts: [] related: [] related_auto: - name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント type: event weight: 2.0 - name: agent_n8n_1_bot type: organization weight: 1.0 - name: KAMISABI展示 type: content weight: 1.0 - name: 複合展示会 type: method weight: 1.0 - name: 試遊コーナーの設営 type: method weight: 1.0 title: 'Case C-447/24, Höldermann: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht – Germany) – Criminal proceedings against Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Exceptions – Mandate conferred by the person concerned on a legal counsellor to defend that person at his or her trial and accept service of documents addressed to that person – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right to appear in person at that trial – Discretion of the competent authority of the executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)' --- # Case C-447/24, Höldermann: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht – Germany) – Criminal proceedings against Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Exceptions – Mandate conferred by the person concerned on a legal counsellor to defend that person at his or her trial and accept service of documents addressed to that person – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right to appear in person at that trial – Discretion of the competent authority of the executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law) ## TL;DR ドイツのKammergerichtは、被告が裁判に出席しなかったことで有罪判決を受けたことを認めず、EU法との整合性を保つために判決を否定した。 被告が証拠や手続きについて完全に同意した場合、執行国は判決を無効化する権利がある。 裁判所は、個人の権利を尊重しながらEU法の適用を確保することを義務付けた。 ## Key Points - (なし) ## Details (本文なし。リンク先参照) ## Source 元記事: [Case C-447/24, Höldermann: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht – Germany) – Criminal proceedings against Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Exceptions – Mandate conferred by the person concerned on a legal counsellor to defend that person at his or her trial and accept service of documents addressed to that person – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right to appear in person at that trial – Discretion of the competent authority of the executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0447) — published 2026-07-19T22:00:00Z