---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260719-940ac9
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TA0284
url_hash: 940ac9ec49a11ed6d9c19d3037ecdf4dd5ff0b56757f9e356865350fcc1487ec
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TA0284
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-19T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:38.902340Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:26:32Z'
status: published
content_hash: 5ef71a9af557d3c93931ad74def47eed134f0b3faa96b4badbeb84b92e3514be
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TA0284),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: Amber Latvijas balzams AS successfully challenged the EUIPO's refusal of
  its BLACK figurative trademark, ruling that Foodcare sp. z o.o.'s bad faith use
  violated Article 59(1)(b). The General Court upheld the annulment decision from
  March 2025. This case clarifies protection against deceptive trademark applications
  in EU trade mark law.
summary_source: llm
summary_en: Amber Latvijas balzams AS successfully challenged the EUIPO's refusal
  of its BLACK figurative trademark, ruling that Foodcare sp. z o.o.'s bad faith use
  violated Article 59(1)(b). The General Court upheld the annulment decision from
  March 2025. This case clarifies protection against deceptive trademark applications
  in EU trade mark law.
provenance:
  doc_id: 62025TA0284
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: biz_general
  type: TopicSub
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: domestic_politics
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: sci_environment
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
- name: KAMISABI展示
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case T-284/25: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – Amber Latvijas
  balzams v EUIPO – Foodcare (BLACK) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU
  figurative mark BLACK – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)'
---

# Case T-284/25: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – Amber Latvijas balzams v EUIPO – Foodcare (BLACK) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BLACK – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

## TL;DR
Amber Latvijas balzams AS successfully challenged the EUIPO's refusal of its BLACK figurative trademark, ruling that Foodcare sp. z o.o.'s bad faith use violated Article 59(1)(b). The General Court upheld the annulment decision from March 2025. This case clarifies protection against deceptive trademark applications in EU trade mark law.

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case T-284/25: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – Amber Latvijas balzams v EUIPO – Foodcare (BLACK) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark BLACK – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TA0284) — published 2026-07-19T22:00:00Z