---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260719-456c59
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0095
url_hash: 456c59c17121191418bd6a19e376e6a028a73852461e435ecd9e686a2eb880af
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0095
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-19T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:39.004507Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:26:32Z'
status: published
content_hash: 78b5ec9e42a2e35fd72130e6a523ed1c0f1c661bcb98c10854244b53a27adf28
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62024CA0095),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: イタリアの上訴裁判所が、アタウに対し仮定判決を発布し、EU法と一致するように国内法を解釈する義務があることを確認した。被告は審理に出席しないため有効な逮捕令を執行できない可能性がある。裁判所は、EU法が優先することを強調した。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: イタリアの上訴裁判所が、アタウに対し仮定判決を発布し、EU法と一致するように国内法を解釈する義務があることを確認した。被告は審理に出席しないため有効な逮捕令を執行できない可能性がある。裁判所は、EU法が優先することを強調した。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62024CA0095
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
- name: KAMISABI展示
  type: content
  weight: 1.0
- name: 複合展示会
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
- name: 試遊コーナーの設営
  type: method
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case C-95/24, Khuzdar: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026
  (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Napoli – Italy) –
  Criminal proceedings against ATAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial
  cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest
  warrant – Surrender procedure between Member States – Optional grounds for non-execution –
  Article 4(6) – Undertaking by the executing Member State to execute the sentence
  in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition
  of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving
  deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) –
  Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her
  conviction – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of
  that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right
  to appear in person at that trial – Assessment by the competent authority of the
  executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with
  EU law)'
---

# Case C-95/24, Khuzdar: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Napoli – Italy) – Criminal proceedings against ATAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Surrender procedure between Member States – Optional grounds for non-execution – Article 4(6) – Undertaking by the executing Member State to execute the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right to appear in person at that trial – Assessment by the competent authority of the executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)

## TL;DR
イタリアの上訴裁判所が、アタウに対し仮定判決を発布し、EU法と一致するように国内法を解釈する義務があることを確認した。被告は審理に出席しないため有効な逮捕令を執行できない可能性がある。裁判所は、EU法が優先することを強調した。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case C-95/24, Khuzdar: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Napoli – Italy) – Criminal proceedings against ATAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Surrender procedure between Member States – Optional grounds for non-execution – Article 4(6) – Undertaking by the executing Member State to execute the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction – Information regarding the scheduled date of the hearing and place of that trial – Voluntary and unequivocal waiver by the person concerned of the right to appear in person at that trial – Assessment by the competent authority of the executing Member State – Obligation to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024CA0095) — published 2026-07-19T22:00:00Z