---
schema_version: '1.0'
id: government-20260719-310b18
content_kind: government-document
url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TA0313
url_hash: 310b18307535eb88eb5844f3802a155afe98a5af76f45e9f0f7dbe625d77c681
canonical_url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TA0313
source: eu-eurlex
category: government/eu
category_raw: case-law
country: eu
region: eu
tags: []
lang: en
published_at: '2026-07-19T22:00:00Z'
fetched_at: '2026-07-25T17:44:38.824594Z'
updated_at: '2026-07-25T18:26:32Z'
status: published
content_hash: 267e02e2d2bc38bdbfe4f31ccc47c2114ccef3dba04779cc891210f8499fb77b
content_changed_at: null
license_note: full
license_basis: cc-by-4.0-decision-2011-833-eu
body_available: false
attribution: 'Source: © European Union, EUR-Lex (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO?uri=CELEX%3A62025TA0313),
  CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU). Summarized/translated by portal4Agents;
  changes were made.'
license_rule: source:eu-eurlex
summary: 欧州連合の通関制度において、ロボットアームが通関分類の「整形外科器具」に該当しないと判断。ドイツの地方裁判所が提議した予備的意見審理で、電動ベッド用のロボットアームは_heading
  9021_の対象外とされた。
summary_source: llm
summary_en: 欧州連合の通関制度において、ロボットアームが通関分類の「整形外科器具」に該当しないと判断。ドイツの地方裁判所が提議した予備的意見審理で、電動ベッド用のロボットアームは_heading
  9021_の対象外とされた。
provenance:
  doc_id: 62025TA0313
  doc_id_scheme: celex
  issuer:
  - Court of Justice of the European Union
  doc_type: case-law
  feed_title: 2 - All case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
entities:
- name: DalecaSealanked
  type: person
- name: Europe
  type: location
- name: THE IDOLM@STER 20th Anniversary MORE REALITY LIVE
  type: event
- name: biz_general
  type: TopicSub
- name: Supreme_Court
  type: location
key_facts: []
related: []
related_auto:
- name: domestic_politics
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: sci_environment
  type: TopicSub
  weight: 5.0
- name: Euronews
  type: organization
  weight: 2.0
- name: 7月24日から26日のライブイベント
  type: event
  weight: 2.0
- name: agent_n8n_1_bot
  type: organization
  weight: 1.0
title: 'Case T-313/25, Kinova Europe: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber,
  sitting with five Judges) of 3 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from
  the Finanzgericht Hamburg – Germany) – Kinova Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hanover
  (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined
  Nomenclature – Heading 9021 – Orthopaedic appliances – Other appliances which are
  worn or carried, or implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability –
  Robotic arm attached to an electric wheelchair)'
---

# Case T-313/25, Kinova Europe: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 3 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg – Germany) – Kinova Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hanover (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 9021 – Orthopaedic appliances – Other appliances which are worn or carried, or implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability – Robotic arm attached to an electric wheelchair)

## TL;DR
欧州連合の通関制度において、ロボットアームが通関分類の「整形外科器具」に該当しないと判断。ドイツの地方裁判所が提議した予備的意見審理で、電動ベッド用のロボットアームは_heading 9021_の対象外とされた。

## Key Points
- (なし)

## Details
(本文なし。リンク先参照)

## Source
元記事: [Case T-313/25, Kinova Europe: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 3 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg – Germany) – Kinova Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hanover (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 9021 – Orthopaedic appliances – Other appliances which are worn or carried, or implanted in the body, to compensate for a defect or disability – Robotic arm attached to an electric wheelchair)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62025TA0313) — published 2026-07-19T22:00:00Z