--- title: 'Entity: Supreme_Court' canonical_url: https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/entities/supreme-court.md content_kind: entity updated_at: '2026-07-28T15:04:48Z' --- # Entity: Supreme_Court > Stable entity monitoring page generated from normalized published metadata. - Canonical: https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/entities/supreme-court.md - Last updated: 2026-07-28T15:04:48Z - Search: https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/api/search?q=Supreme_Court - MCP: portal_search(q="Supreme_Court") ## Related categories - government/eu ## Latest articles - [Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Accord Healthcare France SAS and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annexes I and III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-156/25, T-157/25, T-159/25 to T-168/25, T-170/25 and T-171/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-e6884e.md) - [Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#LM v European Commission.#Case T-261/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-d01121.md) - [Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2026.#Leidos, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Approximation of laws – Harmonised radio spectrum – No locus standi – Lack of direct concern – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Application for an order – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-260/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-ce2ea9.md) - [Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 April 2026.#Access Info Europe v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the revision of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Initial refusal of access – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-507/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-a6c978.md) - [Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 January 2026.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Case T-201/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-7b6d95.md) - [Case T-603/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Timchenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to be heard – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Right to property – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-ef910f.md): 欧州連合総裁判所は2026年6月10日に、ティムチェンコ氏がEU理事会に対し、ウクライナの主権や独立を脅かす行動に関する制限措置の維持について異議を申し立てた訴訟で、その措置が比例的でないとして無効と判断した。 - [Case C-841/24: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 – European Commission v Hellenic Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 91/271/EEC – Urban waste water treatment – Article 3 – Collecting systems – Individual systems or other appropriate systems – Article 4 – Secondary or equivalent treatment – Article 5 – Sensitive areas – Article 7 – Coastal waters – Article 10 – Waste-water treatment plants)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-e0bef0.md): ギリシア共和国が都市の下水処理に関する環境 directive における義務を果たさないことで判決された。第4条では二次処理が必要だが、貯留システムは個々のものか他の適切な施設でもよいと認められた。海岸や敏感エリアに影響するため、適切な対策を講じることが義務付けられている。 - [Case T-80/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Xpand Consortium and Others v Commission (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Development, implementation, maintenance/operations, advice and consultancy services in accounting/finance and financial IT systems – Cancellation of the procurement procedure – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-cca4b4.md): 一般裁判は、公共サービス契約の取引手続きをキャンセルする判決に対抗し、法的確実性と合理的期待を保障することを求めた。 manifest error of assessment が認められ、 Commission の行為が不当であることが判明した。 EU 条約の解釈が必要であり、公共契約の取引は透明性と法的確実性を保つべきである。 - [Case T-412/25: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – Parkster v EUIPO – Ühisteenused (PARKNER) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PARKNER – Earlier EU word mark PARKSTER – Earlier national figurative mark Parkster – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-c13ba9.md): 欧州連合商標庁（EUIPO）の審決が無効とされた。申請者は「PARKNER」の商標登録を拒否され、混同の可能性があるとして異議を申し立てた。裁判所は、商品・サービスの類似性と商標の近さから、拒絶理由が成立したと判断した。 - [Case T-416/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Iwaszkiewicz v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Limitation)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-b58496.md): 欧州議会が議員に対して支払った補助金の一部を不当と認定し回収を求めた決定について、Iwaszkiewicz氏は26年6月に一般裁判所がその無効を認めました。裁判では証拠責任や時効の問題も検討されました。議員の補助金に関する規則の適用範囲が争点となりました。 - [Case T-204/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – IQ v EDA (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – EDA staff – Refusal of the request to initiate an invalidity procedure – Article 77 of the EDA Staff Regulations – Abuse of rights – Error of assessment)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-abb52e.md): 欧州防御庁（EDA）が申請者IQの無効手続き開始請求を拒否した決定は違法と判断され、手続きを再開させるよう命じられた。 - [Case C-147/24, Safi: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, sitting at Roermond – Netherlands) – V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) – Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country national to go immediately to another Member State – Interference with the exercise by a Union citizen of his or her right of free movement and residence within the territory of the Member States – Child having never resided in a Member State other than that of which he or she is a national – Derived right of residence of the parent, who is a third-country national, in the Member State of which the child is a national and in which that child resides – Right of residence of that parent in another Member State – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life – Article 24(2) and (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Best interests of the child)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-a939cd.md): ケースC-147/24 Safi判決は、親が未成年子供を持つ第三国籍者の帰属住宅権を拒否し、別国へ移動命令したことでEU市民の自由行為権と児童最善利益を侵害したと認定。 親が別国に移動する必要があり、子供は他のEU加盟国に住んでいない状況が問題視された。 判決は、EU憲法および基本人権条約の保護を強調し、適切な対応を求めた。 - [Case T-140/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 June 2026 – Elettra 1938 v Commission (Application for interim measures – Competition – Commission decision imposing a fine – Bank guarantee – Application for interim measures – Fumus boni juris – Urgency – Balancing of interests)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-a926d6.md): イテラは、コンペティション違反で1559万ユーロの罰金を課されたが、保証なしに支払いが必要とされていない。代わりに、最善実践に沿ったスケジュールによる支払い計画や株権のpledgeを提案する。 - [Case T-428/24: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – Portugal v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from funding – Expenditure incurred by Portugal – Detention period – Replacement of animals – Methods for calculating the increase in the on-the-spot check rate – Evidence of serious and reasonable doubt)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-a36aaf.md): ポルトガルがEUの支出を除外する判決で、291万4400ユーロの費用がカバーされないと主張。動物の置換や留置期間に関する方法論が争点。重大かつ合理的な疑問が存在すると判断された。 - [Case C-396/25 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 – Alexandra Molitorisová v European Commission (Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 7 – Request for access to documents relating to food additives and food enzymes – Partial refusal to examine the request for access due to the very large number of documents requested – Premature confirmatory application – No challengeable act – Action for annulment)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-a19fde.md): 欧州委員会の食品添加物・酵素に関する文書請求を却下したが、理由は要求量が過大であり、訴えは不当であると判断。 裁判所はその決定を撤回し、申立てを再審理するよう指示。 - [Case T-734/25: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (CONTOUR FOAM) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark CONTOUR FOAM – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-9f0dea.md): EUIPOは「CONTOUR FOAM」の商標を否定し、その説明的な性格が絶対的に拒否する正当な理由であると判断した。 Skechers USAの訴えは法的根拠がないため無効であると判断された。 2026年10月10日に一般裁判所で決定された。 - [Case T-237/24: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – DV v Frontex (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Frontex staff – Fixed-term contract – Dismissal at the end of the probationary period – Article 14 of the CEOS – Decision rejecting the complaint – Competence of the author of the act – Delegation of powers)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-9ce30d.md): この裁判は、DVがFrontexから解雇された決定を巡る事件です。裁判所はその決定を支持し、申立人側の主張を却下しました。関連法規はCEOS第14条に基づき、裁判官の権限と執行機関の能力について検討しました。 - [Case C-837/25, Winiacka: Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – mBank S.A. v KM](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-9aedf5.md): mBank S.A.とKMの間のケースC-837/25は、ポーランドのSąd Okręgowy Warsawで仮定的な名称を使用し、12月16日提出され、4月30日の判決が予定されている。本文には実際の当事者や事実が記載されておらず、架空のケースであると明記されている。EU法の適用に関する仮想的な判断が求められている。 - [Case T-246/26: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2026 – Uludağ Içecek Türk v EUIPO – Görür (Gazoz BRAUSE TÜRKISCHER ART)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-92a22e.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月4日に、ウルダーアグ・イチェック・トルクvsEUIPOの案件を登録から削除するよう命じた。案件番号T-246/26で、言語は英語。ELIリンクも提供されている。 - [Case T-528/25: Order of the General Court of 5 June 2026 – Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO – KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS RIVALS OF KABOOM)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-7eb3ae.md): EUIPOのケースT-528/25が5月5日、一般裁判所で解決され、マジックボックスがKMAコンウェプツを相手に訴訟を提起したが、その判決は2026年7月27日に発表された。 Spanish language, the case was removed from the register. - [Case C-312/24, Darashev: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad – Bulgaria) – CL v Prokuratura na Republika Bulgaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data in criminal matters – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Scope – Processing of data collected in the course of an investigation against a police officer as a person suspected of a criminal offence – Recording of data relating to this investigation in the police officer’s personnel file – Lawfulness of processing – Point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) and Article 6(3) of that regulation – Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation – Legal basis for the processing – Article 17 of that regulation – Right to erasure)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-7a6762.md): バルガの警察官が犯罪疑わいと判断され、個人データを記録することで法令遵守に必要な処理は正当化されるが、そのプライバシー権によりデータの削除要求が認められる。 - [Case C-10/24, Dürr Dental: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof – Germany) – Dürr Dental SE v Cattani Deutschland Helmes GmbH ＆amp;amp; Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – CE marking of a medical device falling under risk class IIa – Oil-free dry air compressors for the production of compressed air for dental treatment – Making available on the market – Obligations of distributors – Verification of the classification as a medical device where the manufacturer has affixed a CE marking to the device in question as machinery)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-7589dc.md): 欧州連合法廷は、医療機器規則に基づきリスククラスIIaに分類される油-free乾燥空圧縮機のCEマーキングについて、メーカーが機械としてCEマーキングを付与した場合でもその分類を検証する義務があると判断しました。 - [Case T-121/25: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – Gharbi v Commission (Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – Refusal to grant social assistance – Commission staff members employed in Luxembourg – Legal basis of the action – Implied decision of rejection – Obligation to state reasons – Complete lack of reasoning – Regularisation after the action has been brought – Circumscribed powers – Liability)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-6b7599.md): 欧州委員会がルクセンブルクで勤務する契約社員の社会的補助金支給を拒否した決定について、一般裁判所はその理由付けの欠如にかんしろ、行政行為の無効と損害賠償命令を下した。 - [Case C-839/25, Sorowicz: Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – MG and PP v Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-661e38.md): 2025年12月、ポーランドの地方裁判所に仮定判決を求めた申請が却下された。本件は架空の名称で記載されており、実際の争いとは関係ない。EU法廷が2026年4月30日に命じた。 - [Case T-601/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Ignatova v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Concept of immediate family member – Concept of benefiting from leading businesspersons operating in Russia)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-61da94.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月10日に、イギリスのアナスタシア・インガトワ氏がEU理事会に対し、ウクライナの主権や独立を脅かす行動に対する制限措置に関する決定および規則の無効を求める訴えについて判断。その名前が制裁リストに残されていることに関連する法的解釈を巡る争点を審理した。 - [Case T-321/25, JLG EMEA: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five judges) of 10 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel – Belgium) – JLG EMEA BV v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs Union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 8427 – Fork-lift trucks, other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment – Heading 8428 – Other lifting, handling, loading or unloading machinery (for example, lifts, escalators, conveyors, teleferics) – Boom lifts not mounted on a works truck, scissor lifts, articulated boom lifts, telescopic boom lifts, mobile vertical boom lifts – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1610 – Validity)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-5d24ae.md): 欧州連合総法院は2026年6月10日に、ベルギーの地方裁判所から出された予備的尋ねに基づき、EU共同関税および統一通関分類表における品目8427および8428の適用範囲について判断した。 - [Case T-602/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Timchenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of association – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Infringement of essential procedural requirements – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Plea of illegality – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Fundamental rights – Proportionality – Non-contractual liability)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-59d2ef.md): 欧州連合総裁判所は2026年6月10日に、ティムチェンコ氏が理事会に対し、ウクライナの主権や独立を脅かす行動に対する制限措置に関する決定および実施規則の無効と損害賠償を求めた訴えについて判断。手続き的義務違反や正当な理由の提示義務などの問題を指摘し、非約束責任を問う。 - [Case T-283/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Global Rice v EUIPO – Ricegrowers (Representation of the sun and of Arabic characters) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing the sun and Arabic characters – Earlier figurative sign representing the sun and Arabic characters – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-569964.md): 一般裁判は、2026年6月10日に判決を下し、Global RiceがEUIPOの決定を無効とした。本件では、太陽とアラビア文字を表す旧有商標が不正確な表現であることが判明し、規制第8条第4項および60条第1項c条に違反している。したがって、Global Riceの権利は失われた。 - [Case T-659/24: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2026 – Bloom v Commission (Common fisheries policy – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1382 – Derogation from Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006 as regards the prohibition to fish with towed gear above protected habitats for gangui trawlers fishing in certain territorial waters of France – Article 4(1), (2), (4) and (5) of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Possibility of derogating from the prohibition to fish with towed gear in an area designated as a Natura 2000 site for the conservation of one or more habitats protected under Article 4 of Regulation No 1967/2006 – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-543b9c.md): 一般裁判は、フランスのガンジュトラワーが保護区域で引き網を使用することを禁止する規定に違反すると判断し、誤った法的評価とみなす。 ブロム社は、EU法の適用ミスにより海洋生物保護規制から免除される権利を主張したが、一般裁判所はそれを否定した。 この判決は、2024年1382号実施規則に基づくガンジュトラワーの許可が不当であると結論付けた。 - [Case T-673/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Wazdan Innovations v EUIPO – Push Gaming Product (CLUSTER COLLECTOR) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CLUSTER COLLECTOR – Earlier EU word mark THE COLLECTOR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-523a10.md): EUIPOは、ゲーム製品「CLUSTER COLLECTOR」の商標を却下し、既存商標"The Collector"との混同が疑われることを理由に判断した。Wazdan Innovationsは、反対の結果を上訴する権利を有したが、裁判所はその主張を否定した。 - [Case T-676/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Iran Air v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in response to Iran’s military support for Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as well as for armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region – Transfer by an Iranian state-owned airline of Iranian-made unmanned aerial vehicles to Russia – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Error of assessment – Misuse of powers)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-4901a5.md): 欧州連合の一般裁判所は2026年6月10日に、イラン空輸がEU理事会に対し行った制裁措置の無効を求める訴えについて判断。イラン製ドローンのロシアへの輸出により名前が制裁リストに載せられたとして、理由の提示や意見表明権の侵害があったと認定した。 - [Case T-13/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – HC v Court of Justice of the European Union (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Contract of indefinite duration – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Termination of the contract – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Error of law – Liability – Non-material damage)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-4864e5.md): 一般裁判所は、HCの契約終了を法的誤りにより無効と判断し、非物質損害賠償を認める。HCは一時職員としての雇用が信頼関係を崩したことで精神的苦痛を被ったと主張する。2024年7月27日の判決に基づき、HCは補償請求権を有する。 - [Case C-837/24, Nova Iberomoldes: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa – CAAD) – Portugal) – NOVA IBEROMOLDES – SGPS, S.A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Indirect taxes on the raising of capital – Directive 2008/7/EC – Article 5(1)(a) and (e) – Contributions of capital – Restructuring operations – Article 6(1)(a) to (c) – Duties on the transfer of securities – Transfer duties – Formation of a capital company – Paying-up of the share capital by means of shares held by the contributing company in companies owning immovable property – Tax in respect of the transfers of immovable property for consideration)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-473d82.md): 欧州連合法院は、ポルトガルの税務当局が不動産を保有する会社の株式を出資して新会社を設立した際に発生する譲渡益について課税する規定が、EU指令2008/7/ECに違反すると判断しました。 - [Case T-99/25: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office v European Court of Auditors (Law governing the institutions – Investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Refusal by the Court of Auditors to lift the duty of confidentiality of persons called to be heard as witnesses in the investigation – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Cooperation in good faith – Article 19 of the Staff Regulations – Interests of the Union)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-418cad.md): 欧州公共検察庁は、欧州監査法院が捜査における証人としての発言を許可するための秘密保持義務の解除を拒否した行為を無効とする異議申し立てを行った。一般裁判所はその行為が協力義務違反であり、無効であると判断した。 - [Case C-621/24, Landkreis Schweinfurt: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundessozialgericht – Germany) – Landkreis Schweinfurt v FB (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Article 2(g) – Material reception conditions – Article 17(2) – Requirement as to a guaranteed adequate standard of living – Applicant for international protection subject to a transfer decision – Provision of the material reception conditions excluding benefits in kind covering clothing, everyday items and consumables, and without payment of the financial allowance intended to cover basic personal needs – Article 20(1)(c) – Reduction or withdrawal of material reception conditions due to the lodging of a subsequent application – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 2(q) – Concept of subsequent application – Applicability – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Procedure for determining the responsible Member State)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-3e8c33.md): Landkreis Schweinfurt v FB, Bundessoziale Gericht hat die Materialaufnahmebedingungen für Asylbewerber unzureichend zu prüfen und eine angemessene Lebensstandardgarantie verletzt. Die Bedingungen ohn… - [Case C-820/24, Strominator Elektro: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht – Austria) – Strominator Elektro GmbH v Bundesimmobiliengesellschaft mbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Award of public works, public supply and public service contracts – Principles of equal treatment and transparency – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 72 – Modification of contracts during their term – Concept of contracts during their term – Receipt of the works carried out – Submission of the final invoice – No payment made by the contracting authority)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-3a46ac.md): 欧州法院は、公共契約における「契約期間中」の定義について、請負業者が全サービスを履行し、契約機関がそのサービスを受け取った場合で、最終請求書を提出した時点で契約は「契約期間中」とみなさないとの判断を行った。 - [Case C-907/24, Orefice Generators: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli – Italy) – Egenergy Srl, formerly Orefice Generators Srl, in liquidation v MZ, AV, VR, AL, RI, VO, PA, MG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Collective redundancies – Directive 98/59/EC – Concept of redundancies – Article 1(1) – Transfer of place of work – Termination of employment contract due to worker’s refusal to comply with decision to transfer place of work – Procedure of information and consultation of workers’ representatives)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-383a7b.md): オレフィセジェネレータスが解散中、転勤に従わない労働者を解雇したことで集団解雇が成立した。欧州人権条約第8条と98/59/ECの雇用規範違反として判断された。 裁判所は、転勤に従わない労働者を解雇することは不当であると判定し、解雇手続きの停止を命じた。 労働組合の相談手続きが適切に実施されなかったことが原因となった。 - [Case T-283/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2026 –Germany v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 – Allocation of cross-zonal capacity between bidding zones and congestion management – Determination of common regional methodologies for the calculation of daily and intraday capacity – Action brought against a decision taken by ACER – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER replacing the decision by ACER – Annulment in part of the decision of the Board of Appeal – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No longer any interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-2cc478.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月10日に、ドイツがEUエネルギー協力機関ACERの決定に異議を唱え、一部の取消を求めた訴訟について、訴えが目的を失い手続き上必要ないとして棄却した。 - [Case C-560/24, Besthame: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal – Ireland) – R.S. v Minister for Justice (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Right to move and reside freely in the territory of the Member States – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3(1) – Beneficiaries – Family members of a Union citizen – Derived right of residence of a third-country national – Subsequent naturalisation of that national – Article 35 – Fraud or abuse of rights – Marriage of convenience – Temporal scope – Power of investigation of the competent national authorities into the existence of a marriage of convenience)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-227511.md): 欧盟市民の家族は、その後国籍取得した場合でも、権利の虚偽使用や不正行為があった場合、居住権を失う可能性がある。 第三国籍者の移動権は、婚姻が本質的でない場合に限り保護される。 国家当局は、結婚の真実性を調査する権限を持つ。 - [Case C-389/25 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 – Ausnit, Olariu și Asociaţii SRL v European Commission (Appeal – Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Grant agreement – Project Setup and ITS connectivity of safe and secure truck parking areas in Romania along the TEN-T Core Network Corridors – Procedure for the award of contracts related to the implementation of that project – Enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Eligible costs – Failure to observe the principle of sound financial management in the award of contracts to third parties – Principle of proportionality – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-2258a7.md): 欧州委員会がローマニアの鉄道網沿いにトラック駐車場を整備するプロジェクトで契約を採択した際、財務管理の原則や比例性を遵守しなかったため、裁判所はその決定を無効とした。 - [Case C-326/25, 03 Rayonno upravlenie na SDVR: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad – Bulgaria) – CY v Vremenno prenaznachen na dlazhnost nachalnik na 03 Rayonno upravlenie na Stolichna direktsia na vatreshnite raboti (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Police cooperation – Schengen Information System – Decision 2007/533/JHA – Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 – Alert on a motor vehicle for the purposes of seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings – Order to surrender a vehicle for which an alert has been issued in the Schengen Information System – National legislation precluding the person who was in possession of the object for which an alert has been issued from participating in the administrative and judicial procedure for the surrender of the object to the issuing Member State)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-1d0db9.md): バルガの法律がSISのアラート対応に関するEU規則を覆わないと解釈できない。 サードパーティが車両を没収しようとする手続きに参加できないことを保障する。 判決は、Bulgariaの法律がSISのアラート対応に関してEU規則を覆わないと解釈できないことを発表した。 - [Case C-791/24, TERVE Production: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky – Slovakia) – TERVE Production spol. s r. o. v Intesa Sanpaolo Holding International SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 7(1) and (2) – Special jurisdiction – Matters relating to a contract – Non-acceptance by the majority shareholder of a company of the draft purchase agreement for the shares held by the minority shareholder of that company – Action by that minority shareholder seeking to replace, with a court ruling, the missing acceptance by that majority shareholder – Article 24(2) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Preliminary action by that minority shareholder seeking to challenge the validity of the resolution of a general meeting of that company which approved the transfer of the remaining shares in that company to that majority shareholder)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-19bed8.md): スロバキアの最高裁判所が提訴した案件で、少数株主が多数株主の承認なしに株式売却契約を代替するよう求めた。欧州経済活動規則に基づき、裁判所は専属的管轄権について判断し、株式移転に関する決議の無効確認を許可した。 - [Case T-262/25: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2026 – Sommo Indipendent Movies v EUIPO – Bonomelli (BANDITI CURVA SUD MILANO)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-17f3c1.md): 一般裁判所は、ソモ・インディペンデント・ムービーズ v EUIPO のケースを登録から外すと発表した。 2026年6月9日に発布された判決で、BANDITI CURVA SUD MILANO が訴えられたが、裁判所は事件の継続を停止することとなった。 - [Case T-444/25, Cavert: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 10 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – The Netherlands) – Staatssecretaris van Finaciën v Fiscale Eenheid Stichting X c.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable persons – VAT group – Article 11 of Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Article 132(1)(b) and (g) of Directive 2006/112 – Services of a VAT group provided by a member of that group which does not meet all the conditions for exemption)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-115ec3.md): 欧州連合法院は、税務グループ内で特定の条件を満たさないメンバーが提供するサービスについて、公共利益に関する免税規定を適用しないと判断した。 - [Case T-472/25: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Activision Publishing v EUIPO – Warzone.com (WARZONE)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-102922.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月10日に、Activision PublishingがEUIPOに対して提訴したWarzone.com（WARZONE）に関する案件を登録から削除するよう命令しました。案件番号はT-472/25で、公報掲載日は2026年7月27日です。 - [Case C-440/25, Ebilum: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Zwolle – Netherlands) – PM, QN, RM, SM, TM, UM, VM and WM v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal – Refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals as beneficiaries of refugee status – Article 2(d) – Well-founded fear of being persecuted – Assessment)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-085336.md): 欧州連合法院は2026年6月4日、ネ덜ランドの裁判所からの予備的尋問を受けて、難民認定手続きにおける初審裁判所の権限や効果的な救済権の保障について判断しました。初審裁判所が事実の検証や国際保護の必要性の評価を行う義務があると裁定し、難民状態または補助的保護状態の認定基準も明確化しました。 - [Case T-304/25, Kronospan Bulgaria: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 10 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad – Bulgaria) – Direktor na TD Mitnitsa Ruse pri Agentsia Mitnitsi v Kronospan Bulgaria EOOD (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Combined Nomenclature – Heading 3921 – Other plates, sheets, film, foil and strip, of plastics – Heading 4811 – Paper and paperboard, coated, impregnated or covered with plastics – Product consisting of different materials – Decorative paper impregnated with resin)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-06024f.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月10日に、ブルガリアの行政裁判所からの予備的尋問を受けて、装飾用紙に熱硬化性樹脂を浸漬した層と未完全硬化の純樹脂の表面層を持つ複合製品が統一通関税表（Combined Nomenclature）の3921項に該当することを判断しました。 - [Case C-198/25, Quotal: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Zwolle – Netherlands) – S v Minister van Asiel en Migratie (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Full and ex nunc examination – Extent of the powers of the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the facts by the first-instance court or tribunal – Examination of the international protection needs by the first-instance court or tribunal)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-02b3a5.md): 第一審裁判所在申請國際保護被駁回時，可裁定其信憑性及有效性。第二審禁止限制此權利。 - [Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Sociedad Civil Catalana, Asociación Cívica y Cultural (SCC) and Ministerio Fiscal v RAS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Effective judicial protection in matters covered by EU law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Accounting liability proceedings – Pursuit of the independence of part of the national territory of a Member State – National amnesty law concerning acts giving rise to liability in respect of public funds – Extinction of liability within a maximum period of two months, without examination of the defence submissions and exculpatory evidence and without hearing all the parties to the proceedings – First paragraph of Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU.#Case C-523/24.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-fb614b.md) - [Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2026.#RY v European Commission.#Case C-336/25 P.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-fae3f1.md)