---
title: 'Entity: border authorities'
canonical_url: https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/entities/border-authorities.md
content_kind: entity
updated_at: '2026-07-31T16:14:32Z'
---

# Entity: border authorities

> Stable entity monitoring page generated from normalized published metadata.

- Canonical: https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/entities/border-authorities.md
- Last updated: 2026-07-31T16:14:32Z
- Search: https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/api/search?q=border%20authorities
- MCP: portal_search(q="border authorities")

## Related categories

- government/eu
- government/us
- news/world

## Latest articles

- [Is the Ceuta crisis the biggest single illegal border crossing ever into the EU?](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/news/world/news-20260731-6c38e7.md)
- [OJ:C_202604231: List of the competent authorities designated by Member States which are empowered to carry out the functions and duties, published in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/30/government-20260730-46b5ad.md)
- [Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Promotion – 2023 promotion exercise – Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 8 – Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations – No act open to challenge – Liability – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-313/24.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/30/government-20260730-b93eca.md): XHは2023年の昇進試験でAD8への昇格を拒否された決定に異議を申し立てたが、同条項に基づく資格要件を満たしていないとして却下され、訴えの一部は法的根拠がないと判断された。
- [Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-732/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/30/government-20260730-a5b068.md): Skechers USAの「SLIP-INS」商標が、記述的で特徴的なものであるため拒否された。裁判所は法に基礎がないと判断し、訴えを却下した。事案番号T-732/25。
- [Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Tiemo Wölken v European Commission.#Case T-784/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/30/government-20260730-21a760.md): Tiemo Wölken conteste la Commission pour refus d’accès aux documents dans le délai légal. Le Tribunal annule l’irrecevabilité et condamne à dépens. Décision du 25 mars 2026.
- [Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 May 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark TOTALLY HANDS FREE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-733/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/30/government-20260730-1f694d.md): Skechers USAのEU登録申請が却下され、語呂合わせ「TOTALLY HANDS FREE」は説明的で特徴的でないため拒否された。裁判所は法に基礎がないと判断し、訴訟を却下した。
- [Thousands of migrants storm Ceuta border from Morocco](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/news/world/news-20260730-a216d1.md)
- [Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 February 2026.#Accord Healthcare France SAS and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Actions for annulment – Environment – Urban wastewater treatment – Articles 1, 2, 9, 10 and 30 of, and Annexes I and III to, Directive (EU) 2024/3019 – Extended producer responsibility for medicinal products for human use and cosmetic products – Standing to bring proceedings – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-156/25, T-157/25, T-159/25 to T-168/25, T-170/25 and T-171/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-e6884e.md)
- [Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#LM v European Commission.#Case T-261/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-d01121.md)
- [Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2026.#Leidos, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Approximation of laws – Harmonised radio spectrum – No locus standi – Lack of direct concern – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Application for an order – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-260/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-ce2ea9.md)
- [Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 April 2026.#Access Info Europe v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the revision of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Initial refusal of access – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-507/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-a6c978.md)
- [Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 January 2026.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Case T-201/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/28/government-20260728-7b6d95.md)
- [Gene M. Koop, D.D.S.; Decision and Order](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/us/2026/07/28/government-20260728-b2e731.md): Gene M. KoopのDEA登録が失効したことが連邦通知に掲載され、法的通知を受けない。連邦レジスターはXML版で公開されているが、正式な法律文書ではない。ACFRが承認するまで、これは情報のみである。
- [Kerri Zavota, DVM; Decision and Order](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/us/2026/07/28/government-20260728-7dbd72.md): DEAはKerri Zavota医師に対し、デジタル登録証の取り消しと再登録申請の却下を命じる命令書を送達。登録証の更新申請で重大な虚偽が発覚し、公共の利益に反するとしている。30日以内に異議申し立てを行わなかったため、聴取権を放棄したと判断された。
- [Case T-140/26 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 June 2026 – Elettra 1938 v Commission (Application for interim measures – Competition – Commission decision imposing a fine – Bank guarantee – Application for interim measures – Fumus boni juris – Urgency – Balancing of interests)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-a926d6.md): イテラは、コンペティション違反で1559万ユーロの罰金を課されたが、保証なしに支払いが必要とされていない。代わりに、最善実践に沿ったスケジュールによる支払い計画や株権のpledgeを提案する。
- [Case T-734/25: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (CONTOUR FOAM) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark CONTOUR FOAM – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-9f0dea.md): EUIPOは「CONTOUR FOAM」の商標を否定し、その説明的な性格が絶対的に拒否する正当な理由であると判断した。 Skechers USAの訴えは法的根拠がないため無効であると判断された。 2026年10月10日に一般裁判所で決定された。
- [Case C-837/25, Winiacka: Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – mBank S.A. v KM](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-9aedf5.md): mBank S.A.とKMの間のケースC-837/25は、ポーランドのSąd Okręgowy Warsawで仮定的な名称を使用し、12月16日提出され、4月30日の判決が予定されている。本文には実際の当事者や事実が記載されておらず、架空のケースであると明記されている。EU法の適用に関する仮想的な判断が求められている。
- [Case T-246/26: Order of the General Court of 4 June 2026 – Uludağ Içecek Türk v EUIPO – Görür (Gazoz BRAUSE TÜRKISCHER ART)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-92a22e.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月4日に、ウルダーアグ・イチェック・トルクvsEUIPOの案件を登録から削除するよう命じた。案件番号T-246/26で、言語は英語。ELIリンクも提供されている。
- [Case T-528/25: Order of the General Court of 5 June 2026 – Magic Box Int. Toys v EUIPO – KMA Concepts (SUPERZINGS RIVALS OF KABOOM)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-7eb3ae.md): EUIPOのケースT-528/25が5月5日、一般裁判所で解決され、マジックボックスがKMAコンウェプツを相手に訴訟を提起したが、その判決は2026年7月27日に発表された。 Spanish language, the case was removed from the register.
- [Case C-839/25, Sorowicz: Order of the President of the Court of 30 April 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie – Poland) – MG and PP v Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-661e38.md): 2025年12月、ポーランドの地方裁判所に仮定判決を求めた申請が却下された。本件は架空の名称で記載されており、実際の争いとは関係ない。EU法廷が2026年4月30日に命じた。
- [Case T-283/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2026 –Germany v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 – Allocation of cross-zonal capacity between bidding zones and congestion management – Determination of common regional methodologies for the calculation of daily and intraday capacity – Action brought against a decision taken by ACER – Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER replacing the decision by ACER – Annulment in part of the decision of the Board of Appeal – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No longer any interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-2cc478.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月10日に、ドイツがEUエネルギー協力機関ACERの決定に異議を唱え、一部の取消を求めた訴訟について、訴えが目的を失い手続き上必要ないとして棄却した。
- [Case T-262/25: Order of the General Court of 9 June 2026 – Sommo Indipendent Movies v EUIPO – Bonomelli (BANDITI CURVA SUD MILANO)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-17f3c1.md): 一般裁判所は、ソモ・インディペンデント・ムービーズ v EUIPO のケースを登録から外すと発表した。 2026年6月9日に発布された判決で、BANDITI CURVA SUD MILANO が訴えられたが、裁判所は事件の継続を停止することとなった。
- [Case T-472/25: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2026 – Activision Publishing v EUIPO – Warzone.com (WARZONE)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/26/government-20260726-102922.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月10日に、Activision PublishingがEUIPOに対して提訴したWarzone.com（WARZONE）に関する案件を登録から削除するよう命令しました。案件番号はT-472/25で、公報掲載日は2026年7月27日です。
- [Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 February 2026.#RY v European Commission.#Case C-336/25 P.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-fae3f1.md)
- [Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#FF v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Article 340 TFEU – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-contractual liability of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data transmitted to Europol by national authorities – Reality of the damage allegedly suffered – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-566/25 P.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-f67734.md)
- [Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-849/25 P.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-d99471.md)
- [Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Consumer Rights Recovery sp. z o.o., anciennement Helpfind Recovery sp. z o.o. v Santander Bank Polska S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi.#Case C-566/24.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-c698cd.md)
- [Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2026.#Criminal proceedings against DK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8(1) and (2) – Right to be present at the trial – Express or tacit but unequivocal waiver – National legislation interpreted as allowing a person who is the subject of criminal prosecution to be kept in detention in order for his or her right to be present at the trial to be safeguarded.#Case C-68/26 PPU.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-be219d.md)
- [Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#CW v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Case C-565/25 P.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-bca29a.md)
- [Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 14 July 2026.#Voice - Bundesverband der IT-Anwender eV v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – Application to intervene – Admissibility of the request – Time limit for lodging – Method for calculating the time limit – Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union – Extension of the time limit on account of distance – Out of time – Effective judicial protection – Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-111/26 P(I).](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-aadfbe.md)
- [Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-923d90.md)
- [Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Bytové družstvo so sídlom v Trnave v Prima banka Slovensko, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Trnave.#Case C-168/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-52fc9f.md)
- [Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 July 2026.#Emilio De Capitani v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Working documents issued by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union – No publication, in the Council’s register, of documents submitted following a request for access – Article 10 and Article 16(8) TEU – Article 15 TFEU – No implied refusal to publish – No challengeable act – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-13/26 P.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-1513e2.md)
- [Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#RI v Openbaar Ministerie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing custodial sentences – Article 6(1) – Issuing judicial authority – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office on the basis of a national arrest warrant issued by a court – No judicial review concerning the issue of the European arrest warrant – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-446/26 PPU.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-e66615.md)
- [Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 June 2026.#Technikes Anaktisis kai Diachorismou AE (ECORESET AE) v Perifereia Attikis.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Reply which may be clearly deduced from existing case-law – Private investment aid scheme – Aid scheme compatible with the internal market – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid under that scheme – Legal action seeking annulment of that refusal decision – Retroactive effect of a possible judicial annulment of that refusal decision – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the period laid down for granting the aid under that aid scheme – Date on which the aid concerned is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing aid.#Case C-255/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-e2d472.md): Greeceの公的投資援助制度がEU法と相容れるかを尋ねた裁判で、権利侵害があった場合に効果的な救済が保障されることを示唆する。技ニケス・エコレセットAEが地域開発支援を拒否されたが、その決定は法的根拠がないと判断され、個人の権利侵害として扱われる可能性がある。EUの基本的人権保障が守られるために、適切な補償が必要である。
- [Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2026.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark CONTOUR FOAM – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-734/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-dee697.md): Skechers USAの「CONTOUR FOAM」商標が欧州で不可登録とされたのは、説明的な性格によるため。裁判所は法的根拠が欠如しているため、訴訟を却下しコスト負担も課す。
- [Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 February 2026.#GE v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation and European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement services of the Member States – Alleged unlawful processing of personal data – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Practice Rules for the Implementation of the Rules of Procedure – Clarification of references to the annexes – Action in part brought before a court manifestly lacking jurisdiction to hear and determine it, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-587/24.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-a20ce1.md): GEは、欧州刑事司法協議会（Eurojust）や欧州警備協議会（Europol）、ベルギー・フランスのデータ収集による不正処理で非物質的損害を求める訴訟が、手続き要件違反と管轄権不在により却下された。 2019年、ベルギー・フランスがSky ECC暗号通信サービスのデータを収集し、殺人企業の計画を阻止したが、手続き上問題がある。 EU機関と国際的な調査で個人情報が不正に処理されたため、非契約責任…
- [Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2026.#Indra Sistemas, SA v European External Action Service.#Interim measures – Public procurement – Negotiated tender procedure – Sole tenderer – Rejection of the tender – Application for suspension of operation and interim measures – No urgency.#Case T-17/26 R.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-4c9b25.md): 欧州外交サービスの独自入札が却下され、申請者が新たな入札を求めることも禁止されるよう、一般院の緊急措置を求めたが却下された。判事は、EU法に基づく行為の法的性質が疑われないため、中断措置を許可できないと指摘した。
- [Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 March 2026.#HD and Others v European Parliament and European External Action Service.#Case T-5/25.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-0ac584.md): HDとその子女がパリメント官僚の暴力で被害を受け、パリメント・EUとSEAEに17万円の損害賠償請求。裁判所は訴えが不可抗力のため即決し、パリメント・EUとSEAEに17万円と利息を支払わせる。
- [Order of the President of the General Court of 20 July 2026.#Goldwind Science ＆amp;amp; Technology Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Interim relief – Regulation (EU) 2022/2560 – Foreign subsidies – Request for information – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Lack of urgency.#Case T-335/26 R.](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/25/government-20260725-e0234a.md): 金윈は欧州委員会の外国補助金調査に応じて延期を求めたが、緊急性がないため中止。2026年3月20日に決定した内部調査開始命令に対して上訴。EU規制2022/2560の外国補助金対象かどうかを確認するための情報提供が遅延。
- [Case T-285/25: Order of the Court of 3 June 2026 – Fountoulis v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Rules governing expenses and allowances for Members of Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Right of access to the file – Limitation period – Error of law and fact – Error of assessment – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/19/government-20260719-f40050.md): 欧州議会がLabros Fountoulis氏に対して不正払いとして16万2千ユーロを回収する決定を下したが、その決定は法的根拠がなく、訴えは成立しないと判示された。
- [Case C-850/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 9 June 2026 Appeal brought on 18 December 2025 by Swissgrid AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 October 2025 – T-557/23, Swissgrid v ACER (Appeal–Regulation (EU) 2017/2195–European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/19/government-20260719-e89c94.md): 欧州連合裁判所は2026年6月9日に、スイスグリッドAGが提起した上訴を認めず。上訴請求がEU法の統一性や発展に重大な問題を提起していないため。
- [Case C-851/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 9 June 2026 Appeal brought on 18 December 2025 by Swissgrid AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 October 2025 – T-558/23, Swissgrid v ACER (Appeal–Regulation (EU) 2017/2195–European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/19/government-20260719-a2c779.md)
- [Case T-355/25: Order of the General Court of 3 June 2026 – DV v Council and Others (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – National staff member seconded to EUPOL COPPS – Standard Operating Procedure concerning the Performance and Development Process – Form finalising a Performance Improvement Plan – Measure not open to challenge – Intermediate measure – Manifest inadmissibility)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/19/government-20260719-810421.md)
- [CaseC-698/25, Gesico Outsourcing Integral: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 June 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social no2 de León – Spain) – LG v Gesico Outsourcing Integral, S.L. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – European Social Charter – Amount of remuneration payable for overtime work – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)](https://portal.chinng-lab-srv.dev/government/eu/2026/07/19/government-20260719-325a68.md): スペインのソーシャルコートが、オーバーワークに対する賃金についての請求を却下した。 欧州裁判所は管轄権がないことが判明し、決定は無効とされる。